USPTO serial 78239060
ANTIQUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ANTIQUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bradley L. Cohn
BRADLEY L COHN PATTISHALL, MCAULIFFE, NEWBURY, HILLIARD311 S WACKER DR STE 5000CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | PLUMBING PRODUCTS AND FIXTURES, NAMELY FAUCETS FOR LAVATORIES, SHOWERS, BATHTUBS AND BIDETS; FAUCET HANDLES, SPOUTS AND INSERTS; FAUCET KITS COMPRISING COMBINATIONS OF ITEMS SELECTED FROM FAUCET, SPOUT, CAPS, POP-UP DRAIN, TAIL PIECE AND FLEXIBLE CONNECTIONS, HANDLES, HANDLE TRIM, HANDLE INSERTS, HANDLE SKIRTS, TRIM RINGS, VALVE, SHOWERHEAD, ARM, FLANGE, FACEPLATE, HAND SHOWER, VERTICAL SPRAY FOR BIDET; AND PARTS FOR ALL THE AFORESAID GOODS | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | BATHROOM ACCESSORIES, NAMELY SOAP DISHES, TOILET PAPER HOLDERS, SHELVES MADE OF GLASS FOR BATHROOM USE, ROBE HOOKS, TOWEL BARS AND TOWEL HOLDERS, TUMBLERS/ TOOTHBRUSH HOLDERS, AND GLASS TUMBLERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 19, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | RECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 20, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |