USPTO serial 78240215
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
ROAD TOWN, TORTOLA, VG
Chichester, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan C. Shin, Esq. and Zeynel Karcioglu, Esq.
Susan C. Shin, Esq. and Zeynel Karcioglu, Esq. Zeynel Karcioglu, Esq36 East 20th Street, 6th FloorNew York, NY 10003UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial services; credit and debit card services; fund investments; fund transfers; insurance consultancy; capital investment; issue of tokens of value; financial management; Financial services; credit and debit card services; fund investments; fund transfers; insurance consultancy; capital investment; issue of tokens of value; financial management | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2007 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 30, 2007 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |