Drawing for ASSISTED RESPONSE

USPTO serial 78240385

ASSISTED RESPONSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ESTRADA, LINDA M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ASSISTED RESPONSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kent E. Baldauf, Jr., Registration No. 36,082

KENT E BALDAUF JR REGISTRATION NO 3 WEBB ZIESENHEIM LOGSDON ORKIN & HANSON700 KOPPERS BLDG 436 SEVENTH AVEPITTSBURGH, PA 15219-1818UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer programs, namely an interactive natural language processing knowledge base used to build and customize interactive conversational mechanisms which assist, answer questions and provide information to users of web sites, for use in real-time Internet relay communications platformsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 21, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 1, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 17, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 17, 2006EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 27, 2006GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Feb 2, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 9, 2005GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Oct 19, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 19, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 6, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 9, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 2, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 21, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 12, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 6, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 6, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 7, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 30, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance