Drawing for DEAD OR ALIVE WIRED

USPTO serial 78240553

DEAD OR ALIVE WIRED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARCY, AMY ALFIERI
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DEAD OR ALIVE WIRED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael Lublinski

548 YORK HL BLVDTHORNHILL, ON L4J 5K7CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer game and video game cartridges, discs, and tape cassettes; flash memory cards; programmed data-encoded electronic circuits; computer game software and computer game programs; computer game software and video game software for use in playing computer games and video games online; hand held joy stick units for playing video games; video game machines for use with televisionsACTIVE—
041Providing a computer game that may be accessed network-wide by network usersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 15, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 15, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 16, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 16, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 16, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 9, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 9, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 9, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 3, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 24, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 24, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 15, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 23, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 3, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 16, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 16, 2004GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 22, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance