Drawing for AIREOS

USPTO serial 78240683

AIREOS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GUTTADAURO, JULIE MARIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AIREOS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dana Brody-Brown

KAREN MARIE KITTERMAN FENWICK & W LLPSILICON VALLEY CTR801 CALIFORNIA STMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in telecommunication networking, namely, an embedded operating system that allows for the transfer of data between stations over a wireless networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 30, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 14, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 14, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 14, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 14, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 11, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 18, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 29, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 14, 2007PBIRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - TQR/NON-ATTY REQUEST—
May 28, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 26, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 26, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 9, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 9, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 20, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 17, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 16, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 2, 2005UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
May 2, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 2, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 1, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 21, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 8, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance