Drawing for REEL HOLLYWOOD

USPTO serial 78241244

REEL HOLLYWOOD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WOOD, CAROLINE
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REEL HOLLYWOOD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patricia E. McQueeney

PATRICIA E MCQUEENEY BECKER & POLIAKOFF, PA3111 STIRLING RDFT LAUDERDALE, FL 33312UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Museum gift store and on-line retail store services featuring clothing, namely, shirts, hats, shoes and slippers, sweat shirts, sweat pants, shorts, jackets, ties; sun glasses, key rings, pins, photographic slides, flashlights, lapel pins, posters, books, coloring books, computer game programs, interactive multimedia computer game programs, board games, card games, hand held unit for playing electronic games, parlor games, magazines, newspapers, pen and pencil holders, maps, post cards, gift cards, writing pens, writing pencils, calendars, pocket wallets, tote bags, umbrellas, novelty buttons, plastic mugs, drinking cups, serving trays, glass and ceramic beverageware, coffee cups and mugs, plastic cups, drinking glasses and drinking vessels, beach towels, beach toys, golf balls, puzzles, yo-yos, holiday ornaments and plush toysACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 1, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 1, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 6, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 13, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 24, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 12, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 10, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 3, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 27, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance