Drawing for ISOGARD

USPTO serial 78241292

ISOGARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WHITE, RICHARD F
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ISOGARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carl J. Roof

CARL J ROOF THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANYONE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANYCINCINNATI, OH 45202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Natural preservative to be used in consumer products, namely, food and beverage products, beauty care products, cosmetics, nutraceuticals, personal care products, and pharmaceuticalsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 29, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 29, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 13, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
May 3, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION
May 3, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
May 3, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Mar 23, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Oct 4, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Sep 20, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Sep 20, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 20, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 20, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Apr 11, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Mar 16, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Mar 16, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 19, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Aug 19, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Aug 19, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 23, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 30, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 10, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 23, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 23, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance