Drawing for XTERRA

USPTO serial 78241298

XTERRA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HWANG, JOHN C B
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XTERRA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rhea Caras

NISSAN N AMERICA INC18501 S FIGUEROA STGARDENA, CA 90248

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Small personal care appliances, namely hair dryers, curling irons, electric toothbrushes, electric shavers, electric massagers, facial spas and beard/mustache trimmers, outdoor electric lights, battery operated lights for camping, lanterns, portable gas and electric stoves for camping and water hydration and filtration unitsACTIVE—
021cookware and camping accessories, namely metal cook sets, metal mess kits, metal cooking pots and pans, cooking utensils for camping, namely spatulas, whisks, graters, serving spoons and forks and knives, dinnerware for camping, namely spoons, forks and knives, food and beverage storage containers for camping, portable coolers and portable cooler bagsACTIVE—
022Tents and hammocksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 15, 2005PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Sep 20, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 19, 2003GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 27, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance