USPTO serial 78241359
BSAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 607
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BSAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Courtenay C. Seabring
COURTENAY C SEABRING WILLKIE FARR & GALLAGHER LLP787 7TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10019-6099UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE USED FOR USER AUTHENTICATION AND IDENTIFICATION, NAMELY, BIOMETRIC MATCHING AND INDEXING HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR USE IN DETERMINING THE IDENTITY OF UNKNOWN PERSONS AND TO VERIFY THE CLAIMED IDENTITY OF PERSONS; COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR USE IN ACCESSING INFORMATION DATABASES AND PERFORMING PERSONAL COMPUTING APPLICATIONS IN THE AREAS OF NEWS, BUSINESS, FINANCE, CURRENT EVENTS, ENTERTAINMENT, SPORTS, HUMAN INTEREST STORIES, SECURITIES, SECURITIES MARKETS AND THE ENERGY AND ASPHALT INDUSTRIES, ANALYZING INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCIAL NEWS; HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR INTERACTIVE ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION | ACTIVE | Oct 30, 2003 |
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL DATA AND INFORMATION FEATURING ENCRYPTION AND DECRYPTION | ACTIVE | Oct 30, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2008 | MAB7 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| May 1, 2008 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 8, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 6, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 13, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 13, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 13, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 20, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 31, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |