Drawing for FC HARLEM

USPTO serial 78241417

FC HARLEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FC HARLEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID M GREENBERG

DAVID M GREENBERG GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP200 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10166UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Soccer entertainment services, namely organizing, conducting and staging soccer games and exhibitionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 20, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 20, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 19, 2007TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 19, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 19, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 19, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 19, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 5, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 18, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Aug 18, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 18, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 20, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 19, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 6, 2005TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 6, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 6, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 19, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 6, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 29, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 19, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 19, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 19, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 27, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 7, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 3, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 29, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance