USPTO serial 78241424
PIRANHA GOLF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PIRANHA GOLF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BRAESIDE, AU
GLENFERRIE SOUTH, VIC, AU
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing; sweaters, pullovers, jumpers, turtlenecks, skivvies, Golf shirts; polo shirts (long or short sleeve) Headwear; caps, beanies, visors, bucket hats, Wind resistant clothing; vests, windproof/ shower proof jackets, outerwear; Rain suit; water protective jacket and pants, Pants; Shorts; Socks | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Golf clubs, golf bags, golf bag covers, golf bags for practice balls, bags adapted to carry golf equipment (shoes), golf balls, golf gloves and golf club head covers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Piranha Golf Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by VOYEUR CLOTHING PTY LTD
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named PIRANHA GOLF
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 19, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 18, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 18, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 29, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |