USPTO serial 78241492
ETELIGENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 2, 2007
- Examiner
- KEARNEY, COLLEEN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ETELIGENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark I. Peroff, Esq.
Mark I. Peroff, Esq. Hiscock & Barclay LLPSeven Times Square44th FloorNew York, NY 10036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Installation of semiconductor manufacturing machines and apparatus; installation of panel display manufacturing machines and apparatus; reconstruction or parts replacement of semiconductor manufacturing machines and apparatus; reconstruction or parts replacement of panel display manufacturing machines and apparatus; repair or maintenance of semiconductor manufacturing machines and apparatus; repair or maintenance of panel display manufacturing machines and apparatus; upgrading of computer hardware, including parts replacement, upgrading of semiconductor manufacturing machines and apparatus, including replacement of built-in equipment and parts, upgrading of panel display manufacturing machines and apparatus, including replacement of built-in equipment and parts, upgrading of hardware used in the manufacturing process besides semiconductor or manufacturing machines and apparatus and panel display manufacturing machines and apparatus | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Technical consultation concerning increasing the productivity or yield in semiconductor or panel display manufacturing processes; analysis of productivity or yield data, process data, sensor data from the device, metrology data and all other data generated from the device for increasing the productivity or yield in semiconductor or panel display manufacturing processes; monitoring manufacturing productivity, yield or device status while idle, during production, and during malfunction; periodic inspection or power-off situations to increase productivity or yield in semiconductor or panel display manufacturing processes; improvement work for increasing productivity or yield in semiconductor or panel display manufacturing processes in the nature of product research and development, and upgrading and updating of computer software; periodical inspection of semiconductor manufacturing machines and apparatus; periodical inspection of panel display manufacturing machines and apparatus | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Tokyo Electron Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Tokyo Electron Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Tokyo Electron Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ETELIGENCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 17, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 27, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 27, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 19, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |