USPTO serial 78241552
RIETVELD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3234135Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 24, 2007
- Examiner
- BESCH, JAY C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RIETVELD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
WINGS RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT S.R.L.
PIANORO (BO), IT
Other trademarks owned by WINGS RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT S.R.L.
Bologna, IT
Bologna, IT
WINGS RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT S.R.L.
PIANORO (BO), IT
Other trademarks owned by WINGS RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT S.R.L.
20100 MILAN (MI), IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ERIKA S. KOSTER
ERIKA S KOSTER OPPENHEIMER WOLFF & DONNELLY LLP45 S 7TH ST STE 3300MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1609UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Leather goods, namely, backpacks, wallets, and bags, namely handbags, sportsbags, beachbags, and travelbags | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Men's, women's and children's clothing, namely, trousers, shirts, T-shirts, jackets, skirts, overcoats, raincoats, bathing suits, underwear, scarves, hats and caps and knitwear, namely, sweaters | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 14, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WINGS RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT S.R.L.
- Other trademarks owned by Wings S.P.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Wings S.P.A.
- Other trademarks owned by WINGS RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT S.R.L.
- Other trademarks owned by BUNCH S.P.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named RIETVELD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 6, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 20, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 7, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 14, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 25, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 21, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 31, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |