Drawing for SUNGUARD SHADE CLOTH

USPTO serial 78241574

SUNGUARD SHADE CLOTH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRACEY, KAREN
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUNGUARD SHADE CLOTH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SOLAR DYNAMICS INC.

SOLAR DYNAMICS INC4487 A-B ASHTON RDSARASOTA, FL 34233UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024Polyethylene knitted fabric designed to allow for the passage of air, but knitted closely to restrict or reduce the penetration of the cloth by ultraviolet radiation from the sun, for use in making awnings and other fabric covers that provide shade, cooling and sun protectionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 28, 2006PRRDPETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST DENIED—
Apr 17, 2006PRRRPETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2006PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Mar 17, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 14, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 9, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 16, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 11, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 27, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 12, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance