USPTO serial 78241761
YP.NET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with YP.NET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stewart J. Bellus
STEWART J BELLUS COLLARD & ROE, PC1077 NORTHERN BLVDROSLYN, NY 11576UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PROVIDING AN ON-LINE DATABASE FEATURING DIRECTORY LISTING OF ADDRESSES, PHONE NUMBERS, AND DESCRIPTIONS OF GOODS AND SERVICES FOR LOCAL BUSINESSES; PROVIDING ON-LINE LINKS TO THE WEBSITES OF OTHERS FEATURING MAPPING, INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS DIRECTORIES AND PEOPLE SEARCHES; PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS THROUGH ALL AVAILABLE MEDIUMS BY PLACING ADVERTISEMENTS AND PROMOTIONAL DISPLAYS | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 1999 |
| 038 | PROVIDING INTERNET ACCESS SERVICES | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 1999 |
| 041 | PROVIDING ON-LINE LINKS TO NEWS AND REFERENCE MATERIALS | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 7, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 12, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |