USPTO serial 78241780
GRAIN STRUCTURE ANALYSIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 1, 2004
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GRAIN STRUCTURE ANALYSIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROCHELLE D. ALPERT
ROCHELLE D ALPERT MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLPONE MARKET, SPEAR ST TWRSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR ANALYZING SUB-MICRON GRAINS ON WAFER SURFACE USING SEM (SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPE) IMAGES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TWINSTAR SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SPEEDWORKS SOTWARE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SPEEDWORKS SOTWARE, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named GRAIN STRUCTURE ANALYSIS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 4, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 17, 2004 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 11, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |