USPTO serial 78241952
LEOCTRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LEOCTRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin J. Beran
MARTIN J BERAN OSTROLENK, FABER, GERB & SOFFEN, LLP7TH FL1180 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | pharmaceutical preparations and substances for the treatment of the alimentary tract and metabolism, blood and blood forming organs, the cardiovascular system, the musculoskeletal system, the central nervous system, the peripheral nervous system, the genitourinary system, the respiratory system, and dermatological disorders; hormones for medical purposes; anti-infective preparations; anti-viral preparations; cytostatic preparations; allergy medication; nutrient dietary preparations adapted for medical purposes, in International Class 5 | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 16, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |