Drawing for AWESOME STYLE

USPTO serial 78241981

AWESOME STYLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARTNER, JOHN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with AWESOME STYLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bryan P. Sugar

BRYAN P SUGAR SCHWARTZ COOPER CHARTERED180 N LASALLE ST STE 2700CHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Beverage glassware; beverage ware; mugs, cups, pitchers, and decanters made of paper, plastic, glass, crystal, china, earthenware, stone ware or porcelain; tableware namely, plates, dishes, cups, bowls, saucers and platters made of paper, plastic, glass, crystal, china, earthenware, stone ware or porcelain; vases; napkin holder not of precious metal; bowls and platters made of wood, ceramics, or stainless steel; non-electric cookware, namely, pots, pans, roasters, steamers, cookery molds, whisks, ladles, spatulas, cooking spoons and mixing spoons; dish drying racks, knife blocks, bake ware, salt and pepper shakers, manually operated salt and pepper grinders; portable coolers for beverages and food but excluding containers for food or beverages and excluding plastic covers, plastic bags or plastic wrap for food or beverages; cocktail picks and toothpicks; rolling pins, cutting boards, baking sheets, pastry brushes; non-metal piggy banks, lunch boxes; non-electric coffee pots and insulated jugs not made of precious metal; French presses, namely, non-electric coffee makers and non-electric tea pots and tea balls not made of precious metal; buckets not made of precious metal; decorative plates; cosmetic brushes, hair combs, hairbrushes, toothbrushes, toothbrush holders, waste paper bins, soap dishes and soap dispensers; candlesticks and candle holders not of precious metal; articles made of glass, crystal, china, ceramics, earthenware, porcelain or pottery in the nature of figurines, ornaments, baskets, statues, statuettes but excluding containers for kitchen and household use and excluding covers, plastic bags or plastic wrap for food or beverages; flower pots and plant pots; non-electric candelabras not of precious metal; non-metal baskets composed of wicker or wood; fitted picnic baskets; bottle openers and corkscrews, plastic coasters and coasters not made of linen or paper; cleaning supplies, namely, brooms, brushes, mops, feather dusters, furniture dusters, pails and sponges all for household useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 7, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 7, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 14, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 16, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 9, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 29, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 15, 2003GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2003GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance