Drawing for GRAND OLE OPRY SINCE 1925

USPTO serial 78242050

GRAND OLE OPRY SINCE 1925

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARRUTHERS, SUE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GRAND OLE OPRY SINCE 1925?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert P. Felber, Jr.

ROBERT P FELBER JR WALLER LANSDEN DORTCH & DAVIS LLP511 UNION ST STE 2700NASHVILLE, TN 37219UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail gift store services featuring clothing, headwear, toys, magazines, books, compact discs, audio and video tapes, DVDs, blanket throws, postcards, jewelry, golf equipment, golf apparel, and golf accessories.ACTIVE—
036Financial sponsorship of sporting and cultural events.ACTIVE—
041Entertainment services in the nature of dramatic, dramatico-musical and musical programs performed for live audiences and transmitted to remote audiences through the media of television, radio, satellite, and the Internet; personal appearances by performers, musicians and celebrities; live performances by musical artists and groups; live music concerts; providing programming in the field of country music through radio, television, satellite and the Internet; production of country music shows; providing a web site featuring musical performances, musical videos, interviews, photographs and other multimedia materials, information on shows and entertainment, musical artists and groups.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 4, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 4, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 9, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 9, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 9, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 4, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 5, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 5, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 5, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 29, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 29, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 11, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 11, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 25, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 10, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 10, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 17, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 10, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 10, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 11, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 17, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 28, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 3, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 13, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 13, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 26, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance