USPTO serial 78242536
KALEI-DOLPHIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KALEI-DOLPHIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Laborie Medical Technologies Inc.
Mississauga, Ontario, CA
Laborie Medical Technologies Inc.
Mississauga, Ontario, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN THE MEDICAL FIELD FOR PROVIDING DIRECT INPUT AND CONSOLIDATION INTO A DATA-BASE OF PATIENT INFORMATION, URODYNAMIC TEST DATA AND STATISTICS FOR MEDICAL AND MEDICAL RESEARCH USE | ABANDONED | Oct 2, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 15, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 1, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |