Drawing for LIKE BEING THERE

USPTO serial 78242625

LIKE BEING THERE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BESCH, JAY C
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with LIKE BEING THERE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael B. Lasky

DIANE M LAMBILLOTTE BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLPTHREE EMBARCADERO CTRSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Telecommunications equipment, and accessories for telephones, namely, telephone headsets and accessories therefor, namely ear cushions, ear tips, ear plates, microphone screens, speaker covers, sound filters, windscreens, neck straps, belt clips, headbands and headset cords; microphone sets; telephone sets; telephone ear hooks for headsets; telephone cords; telephone headset connectors; telephone on-line indicators; PBX-to-telephone interfaces; wireless telephone sets and wireless headsets for use with telephones; telephones; telephone headset amplifiers; telephone connectors bi-directional analog to digital signal processor; coupler for headset to computer ports; software and firmware for enhancement of digital audio signals; and parts for all of the aforesaid, namely, batteries, battery packs, power supply, mobile adapter, stereo plugs, headset stands, Y-adapters, clothing clips, lapel clips, and desk clipsACTIVEMar 28, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 18, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 1, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 26, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2005CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 2005SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 10, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 7, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 14, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 25, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 26, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance