USPTO serial 78242626
THE FORCE IS IN THE FORMULA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE FORCE IS IN THE FORMULA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward R. Courtney
EDWARD R COURTNEY ECOLAB INC840 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWYMENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55118UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | bathroom cleaners, grout cleaners, floor cleaners, floor strippers, carpet cleaners, spot removers, wood cleaners, glass cleaners, floor polish, furniture polish, hand soaps, heavy duty degreasers not for use in manufacturing processes, multi-purpose degreasers not for use in manufacturing processes, graffiti removers, masonry cleaners, deck wash, namely, preparations for cleaning, protecting and preserving deck surfaces, vehicle wash, namely preparations for cleaning, protecting and preserving vehicle surfaces, all purpose cleaners and driveway cleaners | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2005 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 2, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 25, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 2, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 11, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 24, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 26, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |