USPTO serial 78242727
MC2
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KELLY, JOHN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MC2?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Colm J. Dobbyn
Colm J. Dobbyn MasterCard International Incorporated2000 Purchase StreetPURCHASE, NY 10577-2509UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | FINANCIAL SERVICES RELATED TO PAYMENT CARDS, NAMELY CREDIT CARD SERVICES AND DEBIT CARD SERVICES; BANKING SERVICES; CHARGE CARD AND STORED VALUE PREPAID CARD SERVICES; STORED VALUE ELECTRONIC PURSE SERVICES, PROVIDING ELECTRONIC FUNDS AND CURRENCY TRANSFER SERVICES, ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS SERVICES, PREPAID TELEPHONE CALLING CARD SERVICES, CASH DISBURSEMENT SERVICES, AND TRANSACTION AUTHORIZATION AND SETTLEMENT SERVICES; PAYMENT SERVICES UTILIZING A RADIO FREQUENCY DEVICE TO ALLOW PAYMENT TO BE CHARGED TO A PREVIOUSLY SPECIFIED PAYMENT MECHANISM, SUCH AS A DEBIT CARD OR CREDIT CARD; CHEQUE VERIFICATION SERVICES, ISSUING AND REDEMPTION SERVICES ALL RELATING TO TRAVELLERS' CHEQUES AND TRAVEL VOUCHERS; ADVISORY SERVICES RELATING TO ALL THE AFORESAID SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 23, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 26, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 21, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 10, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 1, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 16, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 24, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 4, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 20, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 13, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |