USPTO serial 78242765
MFC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MFC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alan D. Kamrath
ALAN D KAMRATH NIKOLAI & MERSEREAU PA900 2ND AVE S STE 820INTERNATIONAL CENTREMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | WASHERS OF METAL FOR USE TN MACHINES, AUTOMOBILES, SHIPS, CYLINDERS AND TOYS; METAL SEALING RINGS; METAL GASKET RINGS; METAL SEALS; METAL GASKETS FOR USE TN MACHINES, AUTOMOBILES, SHIPS, CYLINDERS AND TOYS | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | WASHERS OF RUBBER FOR USE IN MACHINES, AUTOMOBILES, SHIPS, CYLINDERS AND TOYS; NON-METAL SEALS FOR USE IN MACHINES, AUTOMOBILES, SHIPS, CYLINDERS AND TOYS; RINGS OF RUBBER FOR USE AS PIPE CONNECTION SEALS; SEALS FOR WATER PIPE CONNECTIONS;SEALS FOR PLUMBING PIPE CONNECTIONS; NON-METAL GASKETS FOR USE IN MACHINES, AUTOMOBILES, SHIPS, CYLINDERS AND TOYS; PIPE GASKETS; WATERTIGHT RINGS FOR PLUMBING PIPES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 13, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 25, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |