Drawing for GREENLIGHT PVP

USPTO serial 78242850

GREENLIGHT PVP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GREENLIGHT PVP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SUSAN L. MASETTI

SUSAN L MASETTI ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP1000 MARSH RDMENLO PARK, CA 94025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044Medical services, namely providing laser treatment of urological, urinary tract, urogenital and prostate disorders and conditionsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 8, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Feb 8, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Feb 7, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Aug 20, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2004IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED
May 19, 2004AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
May 6, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
May 6, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 6, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 6, 2004EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED
Apr 26, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Apr 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 23, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 15, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance