USPTO serial 78243216
BOC EDWARDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BOC EDWARDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New Providence, NJ
New Providence, NJ
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | CHEMICAL BLENDING APPARATUS AND DELIVERY SYSTEM AND POINT OF USE CHEMICAL BLENDING APPARATUS AND DELIVERY SYSTEM, NAMELY, MACHINES USED TO BLEND CHEMICAL MIXTURES AND DELIVER THEM TO TOOLS USED TO MANUFACTURE SEMICONDUCTORS; APPARATUS AND SYSTEM FOR BLENDING AND DISTRIBUTION OF CHEMICAL MECHANICAL POLISHING SLURRIES, NAMELY, MACHINES TO BLEND CHEMICAL MIXTURES USED FOR POLISHING SEMICONDUCTOR WAFERS AND INTEGRATED CIRCUITS; ON LINE PARTICLE SIZE ANALYTICAL DEVICE FOR USE IN CHEMICAL MECHANICAL POLISHING SYSTEM, NAMELY, MACHINES FOR MONITORING AND MEASURING CHEMICAL MECHANICAL POLISHING SLURRY CONDITIONS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING PROCESSES | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | SPECTROGRAPHS; MASS SPECTROMETERS; LEAK DETECTORS FOR USE IN SEMICONDUCTOR PRODUCTION PROCESSES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR MONITORING SYSTEM STATUS AND PROVIDING DATA RELATING TO VACUUM, EXHAUST ABATEMENT, CHEMICAL USE AND GAS USE, RELATING TO THE MANUFACTURE OF SEMICONDUCTORS AND INTEGRATED CIRCUITS; TEMPERATURE CONTROL UNITS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, NAMELY CHILLERS FOR PRODUCING CONSTANT TEMPERATURES UNDER CONDITIONS OF VARYING HEAT LOADS IN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING PROCESSES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 23, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 24, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 9, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 7, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 23, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |