USPTO serial 78243960
JOEY GIRL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JOEY GIRL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Erica Doran
ERICA DORAN LAW OFFICES OF ERICA DORAN42 CHURCH STSYOSSET, NY 11791-2605UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | PERFUMES, COSMETICS, AND SKIN TREATMENTS, NAMELY, SKIN CLEANSERS, SKIN TONERS, SKIN MOISTURIZERS, SKIN ENHANCEMENT TREATMENTS, NAMELY, CREAMS, GELS, LOTIONS, SCRUBS AND NON-MEDICATED SERUMS; SKIN CREAMS, SKIN LOTIONS, FACIAL MASKS, SKIN CAMOUFLAGE TREATMENTS, NAMELY, CREAMS, GELS, LOTIONS, SCRUBS AND NON-MEDICATED SERUMS; NON-MEDICATED ACNE TREATMENTS, NAMELY, CREAMS, GELS, LOTIONS, SCRUBS AND NON-MEDICATED SERUMS; EYE TREATMENTS, NAMELY, EYE CREAMS, EYE GELS, EYE SHADOWS, EYE PENCILS, EYEBROW PENCILS, MASCARAS, CONCEALERS, EYEBROW POWDERS, EYE LASHES, EYE LINER POWDERS, EYE LINER LIQUIDS; LIP TREATMENTS, NAMELY LIPSTICK, NON-MEDICATED LIP BALM, LIP PENCILS, LIP GLOSS; SKIN FOUNDATIONS; FACE POWDERS; BLUSHES; BLEACH CREAMS FOR THE SKIN; BODY BATH PRODUCTS, NAMELY BODY CLEANSERS, HAND CREAMS, BODY MOISTURIZERS, BODY OILS; NAIL CREAMS, GELS AND NON-MEDICATED SERUMS; FOOT CREAMS, GELS, SCRUBS, AND NON-MEDICATED SERUMS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 29, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 26, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 3, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 14, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 28, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 25, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |