USPTO serial 78244009
CHARM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHARM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Milton Oliver & other members of
R.H. Ware & M.M. Oliver WARE, FRESSOLA, VDS & ADOLPHSON, LLP755 Main St.Bldg. 5; PO Box 224Monroe, CT 06468-0224Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Eau de cologne; perfumes; toilet waters; perfume oils; bath oils; non-medicated body lotions and creams; non-medicated facial lotions and creams; hand lotions and creams; after-shave lotions and creams; non-medicated bath and shower gels, milks, salts and lotions; body and facial powders; body soaps and skin cleaning lotions, creams and gels; shampoos, hair lotions and conditioners; body deodorants and antiperspirants; sun screen lotions and creams; suntan lotions and creams; lip liners, lipsticks and lip balms; make-up foundations; eyeliners, eyeshadows, blush; nail cleaning solutions, nail polish removers and nail polishes; hand soaps and laundry detergents or dishwashing detergents | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 31, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |