USPTO serial 78244461
RESTAURANT O
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2855988Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 22, 2004
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RESTAURANT O?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CAMPBELL, CA
CAMPBELL, CA
CAMPBELL, CA
Campbell, CA
SAN JOSE, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric J. Sidebotham
Eric J. Sidebotham Eric J. Sidebotham, APC5201 Great America ParkwaySuite 320Santa Clara, CA 95054Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Restaurant and catering services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AP DEVELOPMENT LLC
- Other trademarks owned by AP DEVELOPMENT LLC
- Other trademarks owned by AP DEVELOPMENT LLC
- Other trademarks owned by AP Development LLC
- Other trademarks owned by JCJ CULINARY, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named RESTAURANT O
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 30, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 27, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 31, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2003 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |