USPTO serial 78244531
RADAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RADAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Ballerup DK-2750, DK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Connie L. Ellerbach, Esq.,
CONNIE L ELLERBACH ESQ FENWICK & WEST LLPSILICON VLY CTR 801 CALIFORNIA STMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware, software, and manuals supplied therewith; computer hardware and software, and manuals supplied therewith, for use in authentication, monitoring, and control of network connections and management of secure data transmission and application deployment over local, wide area, and global computer and communications networks, wired or wireless. | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer related services, namely design and production of computer hardware and software for use in authentication, monitoring, and control of network connections and management of secure data transmission and application deployment over local, wide area, and global computer and communications networks, wired or wireless. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |