Drawing for CHARLOTTE FLIGHT

USPTO serial 78244539

CHARLOTTE FLIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CASTRO, GIANCARLO
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHARLOTTE FLIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anil V. George

ANIL V GEORGE NBA PROPERTIES INCLEGAL DEPT INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GROUP645 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10022

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely hosiery, footwear, basketball shoes, basketball sneakers, T-shirts, shirts, sweatshirts, sweatpants, pants, tank tops, jerseys, shorts, pajamas, sport shirts, rugby shirts, sweaters, belts, ties, nightshirts, hats, caps, warm-up suits, warm-up pants, warm-up tops, jackets, wind resistant jackets, parkas, coats, cloth baby bibs, head bands, wrist bands, aprons, boxer shorts, slacks, caps, ear muffs, gloves, mittens, scarves, woven and knit shirts, dresses, cheerleading dresses and uniforms.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 18, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 5, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 30, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance