USPTO serial 78244596
THE REFINERY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE REFINERY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen L. Baker
STEPHEN L BAKER BAKER AND RANNELLS PA575 ROUTE 28SUITE 102RARITAN, NJ 08869Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Combs; brushes; shaving brushes; shaving brush stands; basins and bowls; articles for cleaning purposes; glassware; porcelain and earthenware; soap boxes; bottles; boxes; bowls; basins; brushes; cloths; clothes racks; clothes pins; cases for toiletries, combs and brushes; shoe brushes; shoe horns; shoe trees; soap dispensers; soap holders; sponges and sponge holders; toilet utensils | ACTIVE | — |
| 003 | Toilet preparations; perfumery; fragrances; colognes; toilet waters; talcum powder; bath additives, bath oils and bath salts; shower gels; soaps; shampoos; preparations for the care of the hair; preparations for care of the teeth; dentifrices; anti-perspirant preparations; deodorants; depilatories; depilatory wax; shaving preparations; aftershave preparations; massage preparations; essential oils; cosmetic preparations; sun-tanning preparations; skin and body care preparations; skin lotions, skin creams, skin toners; skin moisturisers; skin cleaners; astringents; lipbalm and gloss; suncreen lotions; sunscreen gels; sunscreen oils and sunscreen sticks; beauty masks; facial packs; nail-care preparations; nail polish and varnish; manicure products; abrasive paper for nails; nail polish and varnish remover; preparations for removing cosmetics; cottonwool, cottonwool sticks and pads, all for cosmetic purposes; pot pourri; gift packs incorporating combinations of the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Hairdressing and beauty treatment services; hairdressing salons; beauty salon services; facial and body treatment services; waxing; manicure services; make-up services; pedicure services; health and body therapy; toning therapy; massage services; cosmetic consultancy services; information and consultancy services relating to hair, hairdressing, skin, nail and healthcare; provision of aromatherapy, stress relief; tanning; personal care and grooming services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 16, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 9, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 2, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 7, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 4, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |