USPTO serial 78244941
PROFORM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COWARD, JEFFERY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROFORM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard Chang
1500 South 1000 WestLogan, UT 84321UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Beauty products, namely, thigh and body toning creams, aromatherapy bath and body massage oils, Aloe Vera gels, body moisturizers and lotions, body balms, body lotions, breast firming lotion, anti-wrinkle creams, foot creams, essential body oils, mineral bath preparations, bath salts, varicose vein lotions, vitamin complex creams and lotions, hand salves and lotions and facial cleansers, toothpaste, shampoo, pumice stones, lip balms, scent-ball diffusers, car scent diffusers, pumice stones, baby lotions, creams, ointments and soaps | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Beverages, namely dairy-based beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Beverages, namely herbal food beverages and chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable-based | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 13, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 23, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 13, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 18, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |