USPTO serial 78245068
INDUSTRIAL-STRENGTH BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3147436Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 26, 2006
- Examiner
- GASKINS, TONJA M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INDUSTRIAL-STRENGTH BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Bevilacqua, Esquire
Michael J. Bevilacqua, Esquire Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and DorrLLP60 State StreetBoston, MA 02109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer services, namely, providing computer consulting services, computer support and technical services, namely troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems, and computer software design for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 24, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MicroStrategy Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by MicroStrategy Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by MicroStrategy Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named INDUSTRIAL-STRENGTH BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 4, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 17, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 2, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 9, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 7, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2004 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| May 3, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |