USPTO serial 78245105
A+
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4351970Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 18, 2013
- Examiner
- STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with A+?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Barcelona, ES
APPLUS SERVICIOS TECHNOLOGICOS, S.L.
BARCELONA, ES
Other trademarks owned by APPLUS SERVICIOS TECHNOLOGICOS, S.L.
APPLUS SERVICIOS TECHNOLOGICOS, S.L.
BARCELONA, ES
Other trademarks owned by APPLUS SERVICIOS TECHNOLOGICOS, S.L.
APPLUS SERVICIOS TECHNOLOGICOS, S.L.
BARCELONA, ES
Other trademarks owned by APPLUS SERVICIOS TECHNOLOGICOS, S.L.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Justin P. Welch
Justin P. Welch Baker & McKenzie LLP2001 Ross Avenue2300 Trammell Crow CenterDallas, TX 75201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Database management in the field of vehicles, vehicle fleet management, and transportation systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Testing, analysis and evaluation of the goods and services of others for the purpose of certification; material testing; product safety testing; chemical analysis; quality control for others in the nature of testing, analysis and evaluation of the scientific research of others; and quality control for others in the nature of testing, analysis and evaluation of the technical analyses of others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Agbar Automotive, S. L.
- Other trademarks owned by APPLUS SERVICIOS TECHNOLOGICOS, S.L.
- Other trademarks owned by APPLUS SERVICIOS TECHNOLOGICOS, S.L.
- Other trademarks owned by APPLUS SERVICIOS TECHNOLOGICOS, S.L.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named A+
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 18, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 15, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 2, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 13, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 22, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 26, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2012 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | OTHE | CASE RETURNED TO EXAMINATION | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 28, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 3, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 22, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 27, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 19, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 31, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 31, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 10, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |