USPTO serial 78245263
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Pacific Palisades, CA
Sunnyvale, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christine L. Lofgren, Esq.
CHRISTINE L LOFGREN ESQ JEFFER, MANGELS, BUTLER & MARMARO LLP1900 AVE OF THE STARS, 7TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | REMOTE CONTROLS FOR DIGITAL MEDIA PLAYERS; REMOTE CONTROLS FOR DIGITAL MUSIC PLAYERS; REMOTE CONTROLS FOR DIGITAL ELECTRONIC DEVICES; CABLE CONNECTORS; CABLE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM KITS PRIMARILY CONSISTING OF POWER CABLES, ELECTRICAL CABLES, COAXIAL CABLES AND CABLE CONNECTORS; DIGITAL AUDIO MUSIC PLAYERS; ELECTRONIC DIGITAL VIDEO DISC DRIVES; ELECTRONIC DIGITAL AUDIO TAPE PLAYERS; SUPPORT STANDS FOR DIGITAL MEDIA PLAYERS, DIGITAL MUSIC PLAYERS, AND DIGITAL ELECTRONIC DEVICES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE WHICH ALLOWS THE CONNECTION OF DIGITAL ELECTRONIC DEVICES TO THE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK WHICH IS USED TO FACILITATE THE DOWNLOADING OF MUSIC INTO THE DIGITAL ELECTRONIC DEVICES | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 3, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |