USPTO serial 78245427
O EAU PERSONAL LUBRICANT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGH, TEJBIR
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with O EAU PERSONAL LUBRICANT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Gels for use as personal lubricant | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 17, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 31, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 23, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 26, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 17, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 20, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 17, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 17, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 6, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 17, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 25, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 5, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 7, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 24, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 19, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |