USPTO serial 78245596
UHC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3197985Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 16, 2007
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with UHC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Tyseley, Birmingham, GB
TYSELEY, BIRMINGHAM, GB
TYSELEY, BIRMINGHAM, GB
TYSELEY, BIRMINGHAM, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JULIE R. BALDRIDGE
JULIE R BALDRIDGE BUTLER, SNOW, O'MARA, STEVENS & CANNADAPO BOX 171443MEMPHIS, TN 38187UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Containers of metal for storage, transport and transfer of substances, namely pharmaceutical substances and preparations, healthcare substances and preparations and chemicals; pipeline and connecting valves of metal for containers; parts and accessories not included in other classes therefor | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 007 | Machines, apparatuses and installations for the pharmaceutical, healthcare, and chemical industry, namely, powder transfer systems with valves consisting primarily of air or vacuum powder transportation pipes and hoses with valves; powder transfer systems with vibrating devices consisting primarily of powder hoppers, feed chutes or discharge devices incorporating mechanical, inductive or pneumatic vibration; tablet transfer systems with deceleration devices consisting primarily of tablet hoppers, feed chutes or discharge devices incorporating deceleration devices; rotating powder blenders or powder mixers; powder blenders or powder mixers having mechanical agitator; powder dosing devices, namely, weight or volume dosing devices; processing machines, namely, dryers or fluid beds for drying, mixing or granulation of powders, agglomerators for binding of powders and additions of liquids, granulators for granulation of powders and additions of liquids, coaters for coating of tablets or capsules beads or seed materials; tablet presses for compacting powders or granular materials to form tablets or pills; packaging machines for packaging powders, tablets or pills for storage or shipment; valves, namely, split valves for installing within process lines, pipes and ducts, equipment or transportation hoppers and containers; double flap valves for installing within process lines, pipes and ducts, equipment or transportation hoppers and containers; butterfly valves for installing within process lines, pipes and ducts, equipment or transportation hoppers and containers; wash stations for parts or modules of above mentioned devices or machines sold as a component of the devices or machines; parts and accessories therefor | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Development and test work for the pharmaceutical, healthcare, and chemical industry concerning high containment powder transfer systems and high containment processing machines; and software development | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Gallay Systems Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by BUCK SYSTEMS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by BUCK SYSTEMS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by BUCK SYSTEMS LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named UHC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 4, 2006 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 5, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 19, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 21, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 12, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 9, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 11, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |