Drawing for DB STAR

USPTO serial 78245795

DB STAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NELSON, EDWARD
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DB STAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark I. Peroff

DARREN W. SAUNDERS HISCOCK & BARCLAY, LLPSEVEN TIMES SQUARENEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Precious metals and their alloys and goods in precious metals or coated therewith, namely, beverage glassware and dishes of precious metal, candle snuffers and candlesticks of precious metal, napkin rings of precious metal, vases of precious metal, jewel cases of precious metal, statues of precious metal, rings, necklaces, bracelets, earrings, brooches, diadems made of precious metals or coated therewith, jewelry and imitation jewelry, gemstones, precious stones, semi-precious stones, diamonds, watches, clocks; horological and chronometric instruments, namely, chronometers, chronographs for use as watches, watch bracelets, watch cases, pocket watches, wristwatches, watch movements; replacement parts for all the aforesaid goodsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 24, 2009MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 24, 2009ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 24, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 2, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 21, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 20, 2005OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 3, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 13, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 9, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 7, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 9, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 26, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 18, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 18, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 7, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 16, 20041.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED—
Apr 16, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 16, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 27, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance