Drawing for Serial No. 78245869

USPTO serial 78245869

Serial No. 78245869

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KELLY, JOHN M
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 78245869?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joan L. Long

Joan L. Long Mayer Brown LLPP.O. Box 2828Chicago, IL 60690-2828UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer programming services for others; rental of software and hardware for online access; services of an internet trust center, namely, assurance and administration of digital keys and/or digital certificates; generation of data processing programs; hosting the web pages of others on an Internet computer server, design services for others in the fields of information technology, computer programming, telecommunications and global communication networks and consulting services in the field of information technology and computer programming; installation, maintenance and repair of computer softwareABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 25, 2010MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Feb 25, 2010ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Feb 24, 2010EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2010CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Feb 4, 2010APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jan 4, 2010FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 24, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 24, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 24, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 12, 2009TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Jan 12, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 12, 2009OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Dec 21, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 31, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 2, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 1, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 1, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 26, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 25, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 5, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 23, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 29, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 14, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance