USPTO serial 78245930
Serial No. 78245930
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3363068Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 1, 2008
- Examiner
- FOSTER, STEVEN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with Serial No. 78245930?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Leopoldshöhe, DE
Leopoldshöhe, DE
Leopoldshöhe, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas J. ROMANO
Thomas J. ROMANO KOLISCH HARTWELL, P.C.520 S.W. Yamhill Street200 Pacific BuildingPortland, OR 97204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRIC AND ELECTRONIC CONTROL AND CHECKING DEVICE, NAMELY, COMPUTER GROUP WARE FOR USE IN ADJUSTING PRINTING MACHINES, COMPUTER COMPONENT TESTING AND CALIBRATING EQUIPMENT, COMPUTER SOFTWARE TO CONTROL AND ADJUST PRINTING MACHINES, CONTROL VALVES FOR REGULATING THE FLOW OF GASES AND LIQUIDS, CHRONOGRAPHS FOR USE AS SPECIALIZED TIME RECORDING APPARATUSES, ELECTRIC OR ELECTRONIC SENSORS FOR CONTROLLING AND ADJUSTING PRINTING MACHINES, ELECTRONIC CONTROLLERS FOR USE IN PRINTING MACHINES, ELECTROMECHANICAL CONTROLS FOR USE IN PRINTING MACHINES, PRESSURE REGULATORS FOR PRINTING MACHINES; PRINTING MACHINES PERFORMANCE MONITORING SYSTEM, NAMELY, EMBEDDED SOFTWARE IN CONTROLLERS FOR MONITORING PRINTING MACHINES FUNCTIONS; FLOW METERS FOR USE IN PRINTING MACHINES; LASER DETECTORS FOR COLOUR RESERVOIRS IN PRINTING MACHINES, BAR CODE READERS; COMPUTER OPERATING PROGRAMS, BIOS (BASIC INPUT/OUTPUT SYSTEM) COMPUTER PROGRAMS; DATABASE MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE FOR CONTROLLING PRINTING MACHINES; COMPUTER CHIP SET FOR USE IN TRANSMITTING DATA TO AND FROM A CENTRAL PROCESSING UNIT; DOSIMETERS; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY APPARATUS; OPTICAL CHARACTER RECOGNITION APPARATUS (OCR); OPTICAL INSPECTION APPARATUS FOR INDUSTRIAL USE; OPTICAL SCANNERS; COMPUTERS FOR USE IN DATA PROCESSING, CENTRAL PROCESSING UNIT (CPU) CLOCKS, CENTRAL PROCESSING UNIT (CPU) FANS, CENTRAL PROCESSING UNITS (CPU) COMPUTER HARDWARE, CENTRAL PROCESSING UNIT (CPU) COOLERS; COMPUTER PERIPHERALS, COMPUTER CENTRAL PROCESSING UNITS, ELECTRONIC AND OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS INSTRUMENTS AND COMPONENTS, NAMELY OPTICAL TRANSMITTERS; PRINTER HUBS, COMPUTER ACCELERATOR BOARD, COMPUTER BUFFERS, COMPUTER CAMERAS, COMPUTER CHIPS, INDUSTRIAL PROCESS CONTROL SOFTWARE, APPARATUS FOR RECORDING, TRANSMISSION AND REPRODUCTION OF SOUND AND IMAGES, NAMELY, COLOR SEPARATION FILM, VIDEO PROCESSORS, DIGITAL CAMERAS, SCANNERS, COMPUTER COLOR PRINTER USING HEAT SENSITIVE DRY PRINTING PROCESS, COMPUTER PRINTERS, DAISY WHEEL PRINTERS, DOT MATRIX PRINTERS, IMPACT PRINTERS, LASER CONTROL PRINTERS, POLYGRAPH MACHINES, SCALES; BLANK MAGNETIC DATA CARRIERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | ENGINEERING SERVICES, NAMELY DEVELOPMENT OF NEW TECHNOLOGY FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE FOR OPTICAL MEASURING PURPOSES; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF DATA PROCESSING; CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF PHYSICS; CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF DIGITAL WATERMARKING, MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE, AND MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; PROVIDING OF TECHNICAL EXPERT OPINION IN THE FIELD OF DIGITAL WATERMARKING, MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE, AND MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; TECHNICAL CONSULTANT AND PROVIDING EXPERTISE IN THE FIELD OF DIGITAL WATERMARKING, MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND MECHANICAL ENGINEERING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 1, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 1, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 28, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 2, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 21, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | CNCF | SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 3, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 3, 2007 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 26, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 21, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 18, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 19, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 6, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 17, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 18, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 1, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |