USPTO serial 78246012
Serial No. 78246012
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KELLY, JOHN M
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 78246012?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joan L. Long
JOAN L LONG MAYER BROWN ROWE & MAWPO BOX 2828CHICAGO, IL 60690-2828UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer programming services for others; rental of software and hardware for online access; generation of data processing programs; hosting the web pages of others on an Internet computer server; design services for others in the fields of information technology, computer programming, telecommunications and global communication networks and consulting services in the field of information technology and computer programming; installation, maintenance and repair of computer software | ACTIVE | Oct 31, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2010 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2010 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 17, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 21, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | TTBN | CASE ASSIGNED TO TTAB | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 12, 2007 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 9, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |