Drawing for TALES OF ENLIGHTENMENT/WHALES TALES

USPTO serial 78246176

TALES OF ENLIGHTENMENT/WHALES TALES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3313376Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 16, 2007
Examiner
ROTH, JASON I
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with TALES OF ENLIGHTENMENT/WHALES TALES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Maureen Beacom Gorman

Maureen Beacom Gorman, Esq. Davis McGrath LLC125 South Wacker Drive, Suite 1700Chicago, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Series of books containing poemsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDFeb 24, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 23, 2014C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Oct 16, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 12, 2007REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 12, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 6, 2007CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jul 17, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 13, 2007SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 25, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 28, 2007EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Aug 31, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 31, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 31, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 3, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 16, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 16, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 20, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 16, 2005TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 16, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 16, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 21, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 16, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 8, 2005TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Sep 8, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 8, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 11, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 16, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 16, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 16, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 16, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 16, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 23, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 3, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 30, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 30, 2003GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance