Drawing for AIRCONN

USPTO serial 78246263

AIRCONN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LORENZO, ROBERT
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AIRCONN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nelson A. Quintero

NELSON A QUINTERO QUINTERO LAW OFFICE PC2210 MAIN ST STE 200SANTA MONICA, CA 90405UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software and firmware for use in design, simulation and control of electronic circuits and antenna, receiving and transmitting signals, and modulation, demodulation and media access control in voice and data communications; computer programs for managing telecommunication and data-communication networks; micro-processor; computer firmware for use in information management systems, operations management systems, network performance reporting systems, and database management in the field of telecommunication and data-communication; antenna; modems; computer network hubs, switches and routers; computer chips; circuit boards; semiconductor; integrated circuits; computer interface boardsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 16, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 26, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 14, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 14, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 14, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 1, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 8, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 8, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 17, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 25, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 5, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 5, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 19, 200444DDSEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED—
Feb 19, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 19, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 19, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance