USPTO serial 78246539
NETOPSYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3005630Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 11, 2005
- Examiner
- KHAN, ASMAT A
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NETOPSYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BERLIN, DE
Berlin, DE
Berlin, DE
Berlin, DE
ROAD TOWN, TORTOLA, VG
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer Software that allows software producers to distribute digital goods in the nature of software, games, music, mobile applications, and movies, in an efficient and secure way via the Internet and computer networks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2001 |
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely, [ electronic transmission of data by means of telephone, cable and computer ] * distribution of software and digital content via the Internet and via computer networks, including LANs, WLANs, WANs, Enterprise Private Networks, and Virtual Private Networks * | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2001 |
| 042 | Computer software development and consultancy in the field of data volume [ and download management ] * and the distribution of software and digital content via the Internet and via computer networks, including LANs, WLANs, WANs, Enterprise Private Networks, and Virtual Private Networks * | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WESSLING, OLIVER H.
- Other trademarks owned by Netopsystems AG
- Other trademarks owned by Netopsystems AG
- Other trademarks owned by Netopsystems AG
- Other trademarks owned by OMNI CORPORATE ASSETS LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named NETOPSYSTEMS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2016 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| May 12, 2016 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Jan 31, 2014 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jan 31, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jul 18, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 18, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 23, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Dec 23, 2010 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 23, 2010 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| May 10, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 3, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 27, 2005 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 8, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 21, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 13, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |