USPTO serial 78247039
CERTIFIED FINANCIAL COACH (CFC)
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CERTIFIED FINANCIAL COACH (CFC)?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | PROVIDING COURSES OF STUDY, INSTRUCTION AND TRAINING AND EDUCATIONAL TESTING IN THE FINANCIAL PLANNING AND FINANCIAL CONSULTING FIELD REGARDING SPECIFIC SKILL DEVELOPMENT IN PROFESSIONAL FINANCIAL COACHING FOR PEOPLE WHO HAVE ALREADY ATTAINED SPECIFIC LEVELS OF EXPERTISE IN THE FINANCIAL PROFESSION | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 8, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 8, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 7, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |