Drawing for CC'S BAKERIES

USPTO serial 78247154

CC'S BAKERIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CC'S BAKERIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas E. Anderson

THOMAS E ANDERSON GIFFORD, KRASS, GROH, SPRINKLE, ET ALPO BOX 70212701 TROY CTR DR STE 330TROY, MI 48007-7021

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Bakery goodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 17, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 12, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 12, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 30, 2005EXPREX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED—
Aug 11, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 22, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 12, 2005GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
May 12, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Mar 23, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 19, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 18, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 7, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 20, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2003EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance