USPTO serial 78247444
CAPOTEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIRIE, VERNA BETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CAPOTEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Englewood, CO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kristine M. Miller
KRISTINE M MILLER ATTN: MICHELE CLARKHOLLAND & HART LLP555 17TH ST STE 3200 PO BOX 874DENVER, CO 80202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer software consultation; computer software leasing, development and design for others; database development, technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software programs, monitoring of network systems, and providing back-up computer programs; installation, repair, maintenance and up-dating of computer software; providing temporary use of nondownloadable computer software for all the following: monitoring and managing inventory, and warehouses; controlling building environmental, music, access and security systems; point-of-sale transactions; database integration and management; managing merchant processing and payment; transferring information over a local area network and wide area network; transferring information between stores and with head office; each for use within the retail industry | ACTIVE | May 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 28, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |