USPTO serial 78247498
DO YOU LOOK LIKE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DO YOU LOOK LIKE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard A. Lyons
RICHARD A LYONS WENDEL, ROSEN, BLACK & DEAN, LLP1111 BROADWAY 24TH FLOAKLAND, CA 94607UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Videotape productions; motion picture film production; educational demonstrations featuring presentations in the fields of psychology, psychological profiling, anthropology, sociology, business management, marketing, personal relationships, pets, and consumer behavior; educational services, namely, providing workshops and seminars in the fields of psychology, psychological profiling, anthropology, sociology, business management, marketing, personal relationships, pets, and consumer behavior; entertainment in the nature of competitions and contests in the field of dogs, pets, entertainment performances, variety shows, comedy, films, television programs, and sporting events; entertainment services, namely, conducting local community fairs; conducting entertainment exhibitions in the nature of book shows, gift shows, stationery shows, college and library shows, boat shows, rod and gun shows, and fashion shows; organizing exhibitions and community festivals featuring a variety of activities, namely contests, games, variety shows, pet shows, dog shows, animal shows, rodeos, sporting events, boat shows, road and gun shows, and fashion shows | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 22, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 29, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 21, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 29, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 9, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 15, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 15, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 28, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 10, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |