USPTO serial 78247522
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John D. Russell
John D. Russell Alleman Hall McCoy Russell & Tuttle LLP806 SW BroadwaySuite 600Portland, OR 97205| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SOFTWARE FOR CONTROLLING LIGHTING SYSTEMS; SOFTWARE FOR OPERATING AND MAINTAINING LIGHT EMITTING DIODE MODULES FOR INDUSTRIAL PROCESSING, MANUFACTURING AND INSPECTION; MEASURING AND CHECKING INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY INFRARED MICROSCOPY INSTRUMENTS AND ULTRAVIOLET FLUORESCENT MICROSCOPY INSTRUMENTS, FLUORESCENT THICKNESS MEASUREMENT OF SOLDER FLUX, ADHESIVES, POLYMER COATINGS, ORGANICS MATERIALS USED IN MEDICAL OR CHEMICAL RESEARCH; LED ARRAYS; ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT SYSTEMS NAMELY FLUORESCENT INSPECTION SYSTEMS COMPRISING SOLID-STATE LIGHT EMITTERS, EXPOSURE SYSTEMS COMPRISING SOLID-STATE LIGHT EMITTERS; LIGHT EMITTING DIODES; LIGHT EMITTING DIODE MODULES AND PARTS THEREFOR; AND LIGHT EMITTING DIODE MODULES AND PARTS THEREFOR FOR INDUSTRIAL PROCESSING, MANUFACTURING AND INSPECTION | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | LIGHTING SYSTEMS, NAMELY, SOLID STATE LIGHTING SYSTEMS COMPRISING SOLID-STATE LIGHT EMITTERS, ULTRAVIOLET CURING LAMPS; ILLUMINATION SYSTEMS COMPRISING SOLID-STATE LIGHT EMITTERS; UV CURING SYSTEMS COMPRISING SOLID-STATE LIGHT EMITTERS, UV DRYERS, FOR PHOTO POLYMER POLYMERIZATION FOR PRINTING, LITHOGRAPHY, COATINGS, ADHESIVES, PROCESSES USED IN THE SEMICONDUCTOR, CIRCUIT BOARD MANUFACTURE, PUBLISHING, PACKAGING, AND OTHER MANUFACTURING AND PROCESSING FOR INDUSTRY; FLUORESCENT LIGHT SYSTEMS, NAMELY SOLID STATE ULTRAVIOLET ILLUMINATION SYSTEMS COMPRISING SOLID-STATE LIGHT EMITTERS, UV CLEANING SYSTEMS COMPRISING SOLID-STATE LIGHT EMITTERS, UV STERILIZATION SYSTEMS COMPRISING SOLID-STATE LIGHT EMITTERS, AND UV FLUORESCENT IMAGING SYSTEMS COMPRISING SOLID-STATE LIGHT EMITTERS, FOR INSPECTION AND MEASUREMENT TASKS, CLEANING PROCESSES, AND STERILIZATION, WHICH SPAN ELECTRONICS, MEDICINE, AND CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES; LIGHTING SYSTEMS, NAMELY MULTICOLOR OR MONOCHROMATIC SOLID STATE LIGHT SOURCES FOR USE IN PROJECTION, EXPOSURE, CURING, STERILIZATION, CLEANING, AND MATERIAL ABLATION; LIGHTING SYSTEMS; NAMELY ULTRAVIOLET EXPOSURE ARID CURING SYSTEMS COMPRISING SOLID-STATE LIGHT EMITTERS FOR USE IN MATERIALS PROCESSING, NAMELY, PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD EXPOSURE AND CURING OF INKS AND COATINGS USED FOR CIRCUIT BOARDS, AND COATINGS USED FOR CD ROM AND DVD | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 31, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 9, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 6, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 7, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 4, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 25, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |